Is sciencientific reasoning always like expert problem solving?

Is sciencientific reasoning always like expert problem solving?

If I get this one right then, no, not really. Scientific reasoning is based on deduction and proofs, whereas expert problem solving is based mainly on experience and schemas. I guess we could say it is a difference between deductive (scientific) and inductive (expert) reasoning.

It is also said that being an expert is not always good. One of the disadvantages of being an expert is being less open to new ways of looking at problems. It has been suggested that expertise is disadvantage when approaching a problem that requires flexible thinking, so called "thinking out of the box"