Describe the Levels of Processing theory? What is its major weak point?
2 posters
Strona 1 z 1
Describe the Levels of Processing theory? What is its major weak point?
Describe the Levels of Processing theory? What is its major weak point?
Re: Describe the Levels of Processing theory? What is its major weak point?
Basically the Levels-of-Processing theory states that memory depends on how information is encoded or programmed into the mind. This theory proposes that deep processing is more effective than the shallow processing. There have been studies conducted which support this theory. For example Craik and Tulving showed that memory was better following deep processing than following shallow processing. The study looked pretty much something like this:
-They asked participants questions after showing them different words (example: Capital letters?)
-They then presented them with the word (example: Bird)
-Then particpants had to answer the question; Was the word in capital letters? (example: No/Yes)
Overall there were three categories of different types of questions that were asked: fill in blanks, rhyme or capital letters. The results of this experiment showed that deeper processing (fill-in-the-blanks question) is associated with better memory. An example of a fill-in-the-blanks question could be for example ''does the word fit into category...birds/etc?''
It has been stated and it is well known that the Levels of Processing Theory is quite influential. However there is a problem with it. The weak point is simply the circularity, mainly because it is hard to define depth of processing independently of memory. We cannot use memory performance to determine depth of processing and then turn around and use depth of processing to predict memory perfomane.
-They asked participants questions after showing them different words (example: Capital letters?)
-They then presented them with the word (example: Bird)
-Then particpants had to answer the question; Was the word in capital letters? (example: No/Yes)
Overall there were three categories of different types of questions that were asked: fill in blanks, rhyme or capital letters. The results of this experiment showed that deeper processing (fill-in-the-blanks question) is associated with better memory. An example of a fill-in-the-blanks question could be for example ''does the word fit into category...birds/etc?''
It has been stated and it is well known that the Levels of Processing Theory is quite influential. However there is a problem with it. The weak point is simply the circularity, mainly because it is hard to define depth of processing independently of memory. We cannot use memory performance to determine depth of processing and then turn around and use depth of processing to predict memory perfomane.
Kasia Bilska- Liczba postów : 44
Join date : 09/03/2013
Similar topics
» Explain the four major theories of concepts: the classical view, the exemplar view, the prototype view and the theory view. WHat are their weak and strong points? What is some experimental evidence supporting or challenging these views?
» ERP, fMRI, TMS –briefly describe these research methods. What are the differences between them? What are their weak points, what are their advantages?
» CHaracterize major object recognition models (template matching, feature matching, recognition by components, configural model) what are their strong and weak points?
» Describe the cases of HM and Clive Wearling.
» What is bottom up and top down processing in perception?
» ERP, fMRI, TMS –briefly describe these research methods. What are the differences between them? What are their weak points, what are their advantages?
» CHaracterize major object recognition models (template matching, feature matching, recognition by components, configural model) what are their strong and weak points?
» Describe the cases of HM and Clive Wearling.
» What is bottom up and top down processing in perception?
Strona 1 z 1
Pozwolenia na tym forum:
Nie możesz odpowiadać w tematach
|
|